Sacred Late Term Abortion

If murdering babies after they are born is reprehensible, and since after 26 weeks is deemed painful inside the womb, why isn’t that reprehensible? Valid question.

Pelosi is so twisted, only SHE could mix the words late term abortion and sacred along with her Catholicism in the same conversation.


Seems that John McCormack asked Pelosi a question that she didn’t like, and was quick to scold him for it. He questioned her regarding condemned murderer Kermit Gosnell and Rep. Pelosi’s disapproval of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, a bill that would prohibit abortions during the final four months of pregnancy (with exceptions for when the life of the mother is at risk).

“You’re probably enjoying that question a lot, I can see you savoring it,” <laughter among the reporters>Pelosi said in response. “What was done in Philadelphia was reprehensible and everybody condemned it. For [the drafters of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act] to decide to disrespect a judgment a woman makes about her reproductive health is reprehensible.”

“Next question,” she added.

McCormack wasn’t finished: “So what’s the moral difference? I just asked a simple question. … What’s the moral difference then between 26 weeks elective abortion and killing of that same infant born alive?”

“This is not the issue. They are saying that there’s no abortion. It would make it a federal law that there would be no abortion in our country,” she responded.

As mentioned in the above, the bill doesn’t ban “all abortions.”

“As a practicing and respectful Catholic, this is sacred ground to me when we talk about this,” she added. “This shouldn’t have anything to do with politics.”


I think all pro abortionists made abortion a part of politics, including Pelosi, so why she got upset at the reporter for the question, only she knows. Or we could guess. Hypocrisy exposed much?

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *